Just six days after the students of King’s College, Lagos returned from a week-long midterm break on June 22 like their peers in other 103 unity colleges nationwide, some of their parents have stormed the Victoria Island annex of the college to protest the visiting day policy while also alleging the mismanagement of the association’s finances.
Numbering about 30 under the name- “Concerned parents,” the group protested the cancellation of the monthly visiting day for June. The school had announced the cancellation on the premise that the visitation, scheduled for June 28, would no longer be necessary since the students had just returned from their homes six days earlier and also in view of fact that the students will soon be writing their promotional exam.
The group, which came with placards bearing different messages about the alleged deplorable conditions of facilities in the 104-yearold college, especially toilet, water and power supply, also accused both the PTA chairman, Chief Emmanuel Oriakhi and the college’s principal, Otunba Oladele Olapeju of misappropriating the association’s funds.
They claimed that based on the audited account of the association for the year ended February, 2014, the income and expenditure during the 2013 and 2014 academic years were N145, 045, 430 and N134, 062, 932 respectively with a balance of N10, 982, 498 while that of the year before it stood at N161, 410, 876 and N150, 595,012 in that order and with N10, 815,855 balance.
Another issue raised was that the association claimed to have spent N59, 949,500 to pay salaries and wages within the same two years without clear information about who the beneficiaries were and for what purpose.
“We also discovered that the association claimed to have spent N3, 376,100 as donation within the period to stakeholders without telling us the beneficiaries and why the money was given out,” said, Mr. Obisike Nwosu, the group’s spokesman at a press conference.
That is not all. The group, also claimed that spending N25, 253,832 in two years on student’s laundry as well as N3, 549, 612 on sewage dislodge and repairs were too high for a school.
On the award of contracts, they said “It is also sacrosanct to note that the PTA chairman and the school principal unilaterally award contracts to their cronies without the consent and approval of the general meeting.
“So, these, among others are what we considered suspicious and with the background that the chairman has been running the affairs of the association with impunity, we are convinced that there is gross mismanagement and misappropriation of funds in the association,” the group stressed.
But both the principal, Otunba Oladele Olapeju and the PTA Chairman, Chief Emmanuel Oriakhi however debunked all the allegations, saying they were not true.
They noted that the ‘concerned parents’ were working for perceived ‘enemies’ not only to rubbish them but also to push them out of office untimely for their sponsors to come in.
They said that was why they chose to hide under the cancellation of the visiting day which all the parents were duly informed of through the Short Messaging Service (SMS) before that day to stage a protest.
The principal, who is due for retirement in about four months told National Mirror that aside from being a member of PTA, he as the principal, is supposed to be the secretary of the group, but he chose not to, to enable him have full concentration on his job and also not to interfere in the running of the association.
While maintaining that he is no signatory to the PTA account and does not also get involved in the spending of its money, he acknowledged the fact that PTA is a saving grace to the college just like any other public schools in the country.
When asked for the school’s financial responsibilities if PTA could shoulder so much, he said the work are enormous and bigger than what the school authority could do all alone more so that the government’s subvention to the college is grossly inadequate like other unity colleges nationwide.
“If not for the support of PTA, the school might have been grounded and I must confess that parents are really doing their best to see that the college sustains its standards in all areas.
“So, since I am not privy to PTA account, how then could I misappropriate its funds? But what I can say now is that the so-called concerned parents are not only agents of confusion but have shallow knowledge of the running of PTA’s affairs and it is a pity that they go this way. But I think the PTA Chairman should be able to use this medium to enlighten them on the running of the association,” the principal said.
When contacted, PTA’s Chairman, Chief Oriakhi also said the action of the factional group was done in bad faith to discredit his leadership and that of the college for their selfish ambitions.
While exonerating the college’s principal from the running of the affairs of the association including spending of its funds, he also claimed that his own hands were cleaned.
He noted that he was appointed into office just last year while the allegation of financial impropriety leveled against him by the group was referring to the period between 2011 and April 2014.
He claimed that most of the factional group members are parents of JSS1 students who are not only new in the system but also do not have clear understanding of how the association is being run. And to this, the group confirmed that their children are only in the JJS arm at the school annex but are out for the entire students of the college.
On the principal’s claim that PTA stands as the college backbone since government is incapacitated to meet most of the financial needs of the college, the chairman asked rhetorically that how then could a fraction of a group who only became members in less than one year champion the cause of the entire group.
“Such is the case of these so-called concerned parents. They are sponsored agents to unionise the association and cause division among members for their selfish interest,” he argued, adding that it was absurd that just 30 out of 6,000 current members of PTA could choose this ignoble way.
Oriakhi noted that the last audited account of the association and the one before it that the group was referring to were both discussed and adopted by the whole house at the annual general meeting, adding that the concerned parents were not members of the association at those periods.
He told National Mirror that due to inadequate teachers in the college for example, the association currently has 44 adhoc subject teachers in its payroll with the least receiving about N40, 000 monthly salaries.
“There are about 50 other categories of workers including stewards and gardeners. So, we pay over N3 million as salaries and wages alone monthly to all of them. We are doing all these to ensure that academic and moral standards which the school has known for since inception are sustained and the records of past students are there as testimonies.
By calculation, the amount would translate to about N36m yearly which is even higher than the quoted N59, 949,500 for two years by the concerned parents.
While disclosing that the whole college had only two Mathematics teachers before additional five were employed by PTA, Oriakhi attributed the difference in the amount to such additional teachers hired after the report.
On stakeholders’ bill, he said the money, among others, were being used as an endowment fund to sponsor category of awards to exemplary students and teachers during annual speech day and prize-giving ceremony in addition to the one organizes separately by the association.
He said the idea was to reward excellence as well as encouraging healthy competition among target audience for the development of the school and education at large.
On the alleged award of contracts to ‘cronies’ as claimed by the concerned parents, the chairman said awarding of contracts is usually a transparent exercise like every other activity of the association.
He acknowledged that truly some of the concerned parents had approached the association for contracts on some of its ongoing projects like the ultra modern hall which has been on for over two years but were turned down simply because it is not logical to revoke contracts when the contractors were not found wanting.
“So, for them to even mention contract awards as part of their grouse is a clear indication that they are only fighting for personal course and they should be ignored,” he said.